This is one last project from one of our Spring 2014
semester students.
Our student did a really interesting project focusing on a
patient with ulcerative colitis. The
patient, Beth, had had an emergency ileostomy.
Beth’s presenting problems were fatigue and pain. It was thought that introducing an exercise
regimen would address these issues.
To measure fatigue, Beth responded to the following prompt
three days each week: “How tired do you
feel today?” This was measured with a
self-anchoring scale with 0 indicating that she didn’t feel tired at all during
the day and 5 indicating that she felt tired most of the time.
Beth’s pain was measured on an 11-point self-anchoring scale
on the same days and times as she measured pain. Zero indicated no pain at all and 10
indicated unbearable pain. As Beth was
primarily concerned with back pain, the prompt she responded to was a rating of
her back pain, specifically.
Like our other class projects, this was an A-B design.
In a general analysis of her data, our student noted no
significant trend in the baseline data for the fatigue or pain variables. Autocorrelation was high and significant in
the baseline for fatigue; however, there was not a problem with data being
autocorrelated for the pain variable.
In the intervention phase, the trend in the fatigue variable
was significant as was the level and magnitude of autocorrelation. There was not a significant trend for the
pain variable; however, there was a high and significant level of
autocorrelation.
Therefore, to statistically compare phases, our student used
the conservative dual criteria (CDC) for both of her variables. The graph of the CDC for fatigue is shown
below:
To determine the effect size, our student used the g-index,
as there was a significant trend in one of the phases. A small effect size was observed and was in
concert with Beth’s reported level of fatigue during the intervention.
To examine the pain variable, our student also used the CDC,
the graph of which is shown below:
In this case, eleven data points were needed below both
lines, and thirteen were obtained, illustrating a statistically significant
improvement from baseline to intervention.
Effect size was measured using the d-index, and a 45.1%
improvement in pain was noted since the introduction of the intervention.
This study had interesting results. Introduction of the exercise program
coincided with a decrease in back pain, but not a decrease in fatigue. Therefore, it was suggested that Beth examine
other options to relieve her fatigue.
With regard to implications for practice, our student noted
that ostomy surgery often takes a toll on patients as body images are
altered. She concluded her study by
saying that “more research studies are needed to
break down the stigma against ostomies, to show how effective mind-body therapies
can be, and to determine the types of exercise that can keep an ostomate in
healthy remission.”
Nice work and interesting
study!
No comments:
Post a Comment